Pacific Rim, one of the biggest and most
anticipated blockbusters of this summer. By the time I’m writing this review
the 190 million dollars budgeted movie has grossed more than 400 million
dollars even before the release of the DVD/Bluray edition. It’s not bad but I
think that the studios were hoping to get a lot more profit from it.
The plot is simple. A gateway to another
dimension is opened deep in the Pacific and some monsters called Kaiju start to
come through that gateway to destroy Earth. Mankind unites and builds giant
mechas called Jaegers to fight the Kaijus and the movie shows the final battles
of this war. Spoiler alert, as in all the movies, the good guys win.
Guillermo del Toro, almost like Steven Seagal,
takes on a lot of roles on the making of this movie. The credits show him as
producer, cinematographer, screenplay and director. The man behind Pan's
Labyrinth and Hellboy had the
opportunity to improve his reputation, but has he achieved that?
In my opinion, no. Sure it’s a fun movie to
watch but it’s not great. This is the typical western take on some eastern
ideas. If you’ve watched Neon Genesis
Evangelion, as I did, you will be whispering “I’ve seen something like this
before” a lot of times during Pacific Rim but, to be fair, I’ve to say that
most persons do not like anime or the Japanese way to tell a story. So, again,
in order to be fair, Pacific Rim, like 1998’s Godzilla, it’s something
that looks good up until the moment you actually think about the plot or the
characters but, unlike Godzilla, it still has its moments that make it
acceptable.
The movie has some rising movie stars that come
from TV shows likes Charlie Hunnam (Sons
of Anarchy), Idris Elba (Luther
and The Wire) and Charlie Day (It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia) as well as
one of del Toro’s fetish actor, Ron Perlman (Hellboy).
From all of them I only found Elba's Pentecost (I might be a little unfair here because I
really enjoy Luther) and Perlman's Hannibal Chau to
have some kind of interest. The main character is completely standard, a lone hero who has lost someone and has something to avenge. The characters were underdeveloped and the use of comedians
in serious movies is a little bit annoying (I don’t even think It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia it's funny, actually) but I think that for the average viewer who might not be too
much into sci-fi or action movies it’s welcoming to have some kind of
comfortable ground on which to relax before getting back to the main focus of
the movie. If we want to speculate a little bit, the main target for this movie
might see some of themselves on Charlie Day’s character. He portrays a
scientist who is really enthusiastic about Jaeger/Kaiju fights so he is
intelligent, with a sense of humor, while not being the main character the
ending without him would be different and is willing to risk injuring himself
to help others…is there even a man on Earth who doesn’t feel to be a little bit
like him?
The combat scenes look great, the Jaegers look
great too and the Kaiju look even better. This is where Pacific Rim shines. The
designers behind the artwork have done a great job in developing the Kaijus and
the Jaegers and the FX department turned that vision into something that we do
not see very often. If back in 2009 Avatar
baffled me with his heavy CGI, this is likely the first movie since then to
impress me as much. The apocalyptic cities and bunkers also look
really good.
But there is something that almost ruins the
movie. The plot is the most important part of a movie and Pacific Rim, as I
said before, it’s not amazing, far from that, and there are some things that do
not make much sense. The cockpit and the way to operate the Jaegers is completely
ridiculous. Two drivers which connect through the brain and a QVC gym machine
to the Jaeger to control it? Why not just use an Xbox 360 controller? I’ve
found it a lame excuse to create tension or to give an explanation to some
parts of the script. Surely in the future, if we get to build Jaegers, we will
not drive them like that. That would be just stupid. The worst part of the movie
was when during a fight they use a boat as a sword? Since when would a boat
endure to not break or to be significantly damaged when thrown against a solid
object? It’s so non-sense that at that point I was looking everywhere to see if
the Monty Python would appear. I’m not entering in other details but… pregnant
clones and waterproof engines? I don’t even know what to say about it. Not to
mention that they only use the best weapon (ironically it’s a real sword) at
the end of the movie when they’ve had it since the beginning.
Still, is the average viewer really concerned
about that? I think not. They will think it was an entertaining, action packed,
great looking movie. And sometimes it’s all that’s needed. It doesn’t require
you to think a lot to understand it. Just two hours of fun and something to
talk to your friends for some time.
While it may please most people, del Toro has
to do a lot more next time if he wants to keep his reputation among his fans.
Plot – 2/5
As stated before, the plot is recycled from
other sources. Nothing really original or expanded enough to deserve more.
Visual – 5/5
The special effects are the best thing in the
movie. It will catch your eye and make you think it could really be true. Also
the design throughout the movie is very interesting.
Sound – 2/5
The soundtrack is really unimpressive. I’ve
seen the movie just last week and I couldn’t remember a single music from it.
The sound effect are just ok.
Performances – 3/5
Like I said, only Elba and Perlman standout in
my opinion. Competent.
Final Score - 12/20
The movie sucks big time.....i think i prefer watching teletubies 24h straight than watching that movie again. Doctor who should travel back in time and stop the making of that movie.....the movie is like one of my farts.....
ReplyDelete