Remember, remember
The fifth of November
The gunpowder treason and plot
I know of no reason
Why the gunpowder treason
Should ever be forgot
- English Folk Verse, The Fifth of November (c. 1870)
It was 1982. Margaret Thatcher was the conservative
Prime-Minister of England and Ronald Reagan had just began his first term in
the White House. The Iron Wall divided the world in two and the Doomsday Clock
marked four minutes to midnight. There was fear in the world and Alan Moore, a
relative unknown comic book writer come to Quality Comics, a newly formed
British publishing house, with the idea
for a post-apocalyptic story. From 1982 to 1989, V for Vendetta was released
and it is still so relevant know, with the Wall gone and the world changed, as
it was when those treats were a reality.
Promotional Poster for V for Vendetta |
This is not a review on the comic. Despite its success, V
for Vendetta was not a mainstream success. It would be only in 2006, with the
release of the movie I am about to review, that Alan Moore’s brilliant book
would come into mainstream. Curiously (or not, for those familiar with Moore’s
approach to his work being transported to other media), Alan Moore
disassociated himself with the movie, to the point where he asked his name to
be taken out of the credits. To a point, I can see how Moore feels about his
work and the movie, though inspired by the graphic novel, has differences in
tone, approach and theme. But let’s go to the point of business…
Another promotional poster for V for Vendetta |
V for Vendetta is, in essence, a movie about Evey Hammond and
how she gets in the eye of the storm of political turmoil. Sometime in the near
future, a series of wars, plagues and terrorist attacks throw England into a
dictatorial government, led by Adam Sutler’s party Norsefire. One night, during
the mandatory curfew, Evey finds herself involved with a mysterious figure
calling himself V. V is a revolutionary anarchist, never reveling his face and
hiding it behind a Guy Fawkes mask, uses Fawkes history as a motif to rally the
English against Sutler’s rule and return the democratic and freedom spirit to
England.
This movie can be viewed in many different ways: an action
movie, a mystery movie, a thematic movie and so on… It is probably all of that.
It is not, though, without problems. The directorial work, by James McTeigue,
is, in my opinion, subpar and that is not so evident because of the screenplay
and the main characters interpretation. The filming is boring if you are focus
on it, without taking any risks, and some shots are awfully done, especially
the bullet-time shots.
The cast, mainly of British origin, leaves me with
bittersweet feelings. Natalie Portman (as Evey) and Hugo Weaving (V) are superb
in different ways. Portman sells the transformation of Evey over the arc of the
movie with excellence while Weaving is able to show a multitude of emotions
with his face hidden by a mask the whole movie. Of notice are also John Hurt, a
personal favorite of mine, who I unfortunately feel was underperforming in this
movie, and Stephen Fry, that delivers a multilayered intellectual comedian trying
to be subversive in a world controlled by a dictator and his censors. The
remaining interpretations are subpar in my personal opinion and I even feel
that Stephen Rea hurts the movie with his Inspector Fynch, a vital character in
the story.
Weaving and Hurt |
Dario Marinelli was in charge of the soundtrack. Throughout
the movie, I felt that the soundtrack was trying too hard to lead the audience
into some emotions and that pulled me out of the movie a bit. Where Marinelli
delivers perfectly is when songs are inserted into the background or even are
integrant part of the plot, in special the amazing Cry Me a River by Julie
London. Of notice, since we are touching the issue, is the inclusion of scenes
of 1934’s The Count of Monte Cristo, with Robert Donat as Edmond Dantes and of
which V is a ferocious (even childish) fan. When epicness is needed, Marinelli
steps down and leaves it for the classics: in a sort of circular idea, part of
the 1812 Overture by Tchaikovsky is heard twice, always when a sort of climax
is about to happen.
All in all, V for Vendetta is an entertaining movie that
carries with it a powerful theme and message.
Plot 4/5
With small details that made me cringe a little, V for
Vendetta still is a well plotted movie, not unlikely due to the source material
from which it spawned.
Visual 3/5
Though the cinematography feels right and delivers
completely, the direction is sort of boring and riskless.
Sound 4/5
Like I discussed above, the soundtrack feels leading at
times, but the inclusion of other songs is perfect. Also, the sound effects
during the movie are more than adequate (even in fight scenes, though it is a
Hollywood movie and suffers from the usual over-the-top sound effects during
action scenes!).
Performances 4/5
The high rating in this category is more due to the amazing
performances of Portman, Weaving and Fry than of the overall cast, but it would
be a shame to punish them for the rest of the cast. Also, I think some of the
shortcomings in the performances may be due to the director inability to direct
than to the cast itself.
Final Score 15/20
V for Vendetta is a good movie that deserves watching and, I
dare say, rewatching. In times like the ones we live, it is impossible not to resonate
with the audience and the idea that:
“People should not be afraid of their governments.
Governments should be afraid of their people.”
- V, V for Vendetta
Weaving and Portman |
No comments:
Post a Comment